Which of the following is NOT an advantage of using LiDAR technology in remote sensing?

Using LiDAR technology in remote sensing offers numerous benefits, but it also comes with some drawbacks. One of the primary advantages of LiDAR is its high accuracy in measuring distances, which allows for precise terrain modeling and topographical mapping. The technology uses laser pulses to gather spatial information, enabling measurements with a high degree of accuracy that surpasses many traditional surveying methods.

Another notable advantage is LiDAR's ability to penetrate dense vegetation. This capability proves invaluable in forested areas where other remote sensing methods may struggle, enabling the collection of data about the ground surface that is obscured by tree canopies.

Furthermore, LiDAR excels at producing detailed 3D models, allowing for comprehensive analysis of landscapes, urban environments, and other geographical features. This attribute makes it an essential tool in various fields, including environmental monitoring, urban planning, and archaeology.

In contrast, the choice that is accurately identified as not being an advantage relates to operational costs. While LiDAR provides superior data quality and is a powerful tool for many applications, it is often more expensive to implement compared to traditional survey methods. The costs can arise from the technology itself, data processing, and the expertise required to interpret and analyze the LiDAR data effectively. Thus, higher operational costs do not